🔗 Share this article

The Norwegian club has called for more rigorous doping control rules after a remarkable case in which a footballer from their female squad tested positive for a prohibited substance from artificial turf infill in a synthetic playing surface.

Precedent-Setting Ruling Highlights Environmental Hazards

A lengthy process wrapped up this week when global anti-doping authorities did not challenge the conclusion of Adno that the athlete was without blame. However this unprecedented situation has brought attention to the potential dangers to players of external contact to banned substances and opened up the possibility of further issues coming to light around the many man-made playing fields across Europe.

The Match and Surprising Finding

The spectre of a banned substance was far from on anyone’s minds when Vålerenga faced LSK Kvinner at the stadium in the city, near Oslo, this spring. Yet a regular doping test found multiple individuals from each side had provided tests containing the illegal material 1,3-dimethylbutylamine (DMBA). One result, from the individual, exceeded the acceptable limit of the set limit.

Inquiry and Revelation

This started an inquiry that baffled representatives from each side and the testing agency, which discovered no common denominators in meals, beverages or nutritional aids consumed by the players involved. The athlete, who has opted to stay anonymous, described the worry caused by finding out she was accused of a violation. “This was a terrible time,” she said. “This was a deeply distressing event and I was confused about the situation.”

She was allowed to continue her career while the inquiry was ongoing. She feels the stress it created may have affected her play and was very grateful when an environmental investigation, which ended in July, at last identified the unexpected origin.

Cause Found

The investigation found, upon examining environmental samples and compounds from different areas at the hall, that the rubber crumb – known popularly as tyre granules – on the surface had contained the banned substance, which had been passed on to the individuals while playing. DMBA is a synthetic substance that activates the central nervous system and is at times included in dietary supplements, although it is banned in the nation and Europe. Research showed, via peer-reviewed scientific studies, to be a compound that might be produced from the decomposition of the tyre material and there is a certain level of annoyance that this was not picked up on throughout the inquiry.

Without Blame Ruled

The individual was determined to have no responsibility in the initial instance in elite sport where external contact has been leading to a suspected doping offence. “I consistently believed I hadn’t violated any rules and I appreciate Adno for identifying the cause to the venue,” she said.

“However, the case and ruling feel somewhat arbitrary. If Adno had not been able to identify the granulate as the source, my case might have been significantly harder. If you are extremely careful, follow all the rules and yet end up being involved in this type of incident, it reveals how vulnerable athletes can be as an athlete.”

Ongoing Issues

These pitches are not seen to pose a health risk to athletes but concerns have been raised previously about their role in plastic waste. From 2031, tyre granulate will be barred from sale in Europe. Following the ruling, the national association recommended that indoor competitive matches be played in open air. Reports indicate approximately 1,800 such man-made surfaces in the nation and they remain common in the United Kingdom, particularly at amateur sports. A universal guideline does not exist to make certain playing surfaces are clear of compounds prohibited in sport.

Urgent Adjustments

The club are urging policies to be reinforced to accept that a positive doping test is not always caused by the player’s conduct, deliberate or accidental. Worldwide policies are founded on “absolute responsibility”. Regulations are detailed in the relevant section of international standards, which says: “There is no requirement that deliberation, blame, carelessness or knowing use by the player be proven in order to establish an anti-doping violation.”

Harriet Rudd, the Vålerenga CEO, commented: “External conditions must be high on the radar going ahead. This involves having a comprehensive understanding of which external factors might cause a positive result. Anti-doping work has to develop and such cases need to be an increased priority of the elements which are assessed.”

Ongoing Risks

There exists a concern that, given that the risk of contamination from surfaces has been flagged, in theory any individual to fail a test for similar circumstances might not be found innocent. Officials further questions whether the probe could have been as detailed if only one or two players had returned samples with the compound during the game.

Future Protection

The exonerated player said: “With luck additional individuals in a situation like mine will have improved rights in the future. Regulations as they are today could cause {an innocent athlete|a blameless player|a